State of CT and Courts Conceal Fraud, Violate Laws and Infringe on Rights

  • Paternity Fraud and Entrapment is AGAINST THE LAW
  • Violating Laws and infringing upon a Defendant's rights is unconstitutional
  • State of CT coerces signature to hold innocent man liable for child support

This letter is being composed for the sole purpose of intent and provides facts while citing law without regard to any consequences.

A court ruling [decision] is NOT always legal – such as this case…

The State of Connecticut Child Support Enforcement submitted the most anemic Acknowledgement of Paternity in the history of Connecticut – with only a coerced signature as their only alibi to pursue me for child support – an allegation I made against the State in open court for which the Assistant Attorney General (Jonathan Harding) never denied in open court. This, in itself, is considered a legal confession by the State and is (and always has been) inadmissible from a legal perspective.

===============================

THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WERE SENT TO THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE AND INTENT TO CHALLENGE AN EXISTING COURT ORDER FOR WHICH I HAVE WILLFULLY CHOSEN NOT COMPLY WITH DUE TO THE MULTIPLE ILLEGALITIES SURROUNDING SUCH ORDER.

THEY ARE BEING NOTIFIED BECAUSE ALL PARTIES INVOLVED SHOULD BE AND WILL BE AWARE OF MY INTENT TO OBTAIN MY TRIAL CITING STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS WHICH HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED BY THE STATE AND THE LOWER COURTS ILLEGALLY.

===============================

This element (the coerced signature on the Acknowledgement of Paternity) is the ONLY element the State has had to present to the courts with NO OTHER COMPLIANCES according the laws mandated by legislature surrounding the Acknowledgement of Paternity (Sec. 47b-172). Since the State of Connecticut could not pursue me legally, they chose to do it illegally – with the aid of the courts.

When the State of Connecticut submitted the Acknowledgement of Paternity, they only had a coerced signature – no DNA test, no waivers – nothing. They failed to check their documents to ensure that laws were complied with and defendant’s rights were not violated and infringed upon. But they instead opted for “hope” that the court would find in their favor – the court even failed to validate the documents submitted by the State of Connecticut to ensure that laws were complied with and a defendant’s civil/constitutional rights were not infringed upon. They didn’t even bother to review the documents and gaveled the order – even the courts violated laws and civil/constitutional rights. Even Mr. Harding admitted in open court that they often don’t check the documents they submit to the courts – this fact doesn’t exactly help the State of Connecticut to assist them with pursuance of support – not to mention the incompetency that follows…

The State of Connecticut nor the courts can’t even produce a transcript of the original hearing because they didn’t record hearings at that time period – more prevailing incompetency.

Reiterating – just the facts alone above does NOT constitute a LEGAL court ruling – as a matter of FACT, it’s all ILLEGAL – proven by me while citing laws for which the State and Courts cannot do. These actions committed by the State as well as the lower courts are considered CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL FRAUD WITH WILFULL ACTS OF VIOLATING LAWS MANDATED BY LEGISLATURE AND INFRINGING UPON AND DENYING MY CIVIL/CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

Now you may convince yourself that I was provided every reason to contest it in court which I did numerous time, but only to have the presiding magistrates (Carbonneau and Dee) compromise their conduct and ethics by abusing the privileges provided to them to uphold laws mandated by legislature and instead opted for the opposition to their oath.

Laws mandated by Connecticut Legislatures provide EVERY defendant a right to a trial (as written in the Acknowledgement of Paternity), but I never signed any waiver of that right and yet it was illegally denied to me and that right was infringed upon – NO JUDGE (much less a Magistrate) IN THE ENTIRE NATION IS PERMITTED TO DENY ANY DEFENDANT A RIGHT TO TRIAL. There’s a hidden reason why the State and the lower courts do not want me to have my rights exercised for due process or trial – all parties involved are making every attempt to keep this case under the radar because they (the State and the lower courts) fear I will reveal the conspiracy to cover up this fraud will expose many parties to liabilities which will undoubtedly prove detrimental to their actions which could result in disciplinary actions taken to include, but not limited to exoneration(s), sanctions, disbarments and/or employment terminations or other disciplinary actions.

If you have ANY doubts about the foreseen, then let’s proceed with a trial and we’ll let the commonwealth decide – You have nothing to hide or fear, right? You have all the facts you need to prove I’m a father, right? You don’t really want to infringe upon or deny me my right to trial, right? Don’t you want to end this once and for all? I have the facts and laws and you have….well….that is yet to be determined. If you opt to run to your failsafe of the court’s decision, remember why this letter is being composed – the way to fight a ruling is not to entertain it, but to defy it. That’s right – DEFY IT! My legal attempt to exercise my civil, constitutional and federal right to a trial has been denied by the lower courts, so my appeal could never be heard. Connecticut Legislatures (and according the Acknowledgement of Paternity), it is MY RIGHT to a trial – there are no waivers, but yet my rights are denied and infringed upon by the State.

There will be no compliance with any order that is illegal – I don’t need the courts to determine this because they (along with State) have already demonstrated every illegal action to pursue me for child support and I can prove all of it – the fraud…the lies…the conspiracy – it will all be revealed and publicly announced.

You may choose to take legal action against me in every way you can, but this only exposes you to civil suits for your illegal actions and the media/news being contacted to expose any such legal action taken against me. You may perceive this as a threat, but if you think about it….The State and the lower courts have illegally pursued and threatened me for decades and no one bats an eye to the illegal actions and damages you/they have committed against me – I perceive what I say as “leveling the playing field”.

Continuing to deny me my right to trial only further incriminates you on state and federal levels.

In my final statement to you and all parties involved – there will be NO COMPLIANCE WITH AN ILLEGAL COURT ORDER. I am challenging you and all parties involved to PROVE I have a child…that I am a father for whom you claim your child support for – I wish you luck because you can’t and never will. You call this legal? …. Let the battle begin… I will not rest until I have justice – even if it means my own demise.

Even if you never believe – God plays a role not only in our lives, but also in the courts…our currency has God in it…we swear people in for testimonial reasons (…so help you God..)…The U.S. Supreme Court cites God in their opening – He can see right straight through all of our hearts – he can see evil in every living person. If you think what you’re doing is in the interest of God (despite your religion or disbelief of it), remember that everything you do that is considered evil against another human being will be judged against you – if it is your “job” to illegally destroy an innocent man’s life for your own personal gratification or seek pride recognition by another evil doer, then not only have you compromised your human ethics, respect and conduct, but also your spiritual one.  The hounds of hell with rise to swallow your soul…

I have the law, facts and God on my side…what do you have?

Bruce Lavigne

50 yr old, SWM residing in Waterbury, CT. Profession: Web/Graphics Designer w/IT experience. Personal: love animals, fishing, beach


http://paternityentrapment.org

One thought to “State of CT and Courts Conceal Fraud, Violate Laws and Infringe on Rights”

  1. A follow up to the proceeding letter was also sent to Child Support Enforcement, The Legislative Commissioner’s Office and the Attorney General’s Office. (no response from any party as of 12/20/19)
    ===============================
    SETTLEMENT OR TRIAL

    THIS DOCUMENT IS COMPOSED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AN OPTION OF CLOSURE TO A CASE THAT HAS FALLEN VICTIM OF A CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL FRAUD COMMITTED BY THE LOWER COURT MAGISTRATES AND THE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT BUREAU OF CONNECTICUT. YOU [STATE OF CONNECTICUT CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT] WILL BE PROVIDED TWO (2) OPTIONS:

    SETTLEMENT
    a) You will contact any/all national credit reporting agencies and remove this alleged, frivolous and illegal debt from my credit profile.
    b) You will contact the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and remove the offset currently placed on my social security number.
    c) You will refund me ALL monies extracted from me since inception of this case as dictated by state law:
    Effective July 1, 1993; P.A. 93-329 added Subsec. (c) re refund to petitioner of money
    paid by the petitioner to the state during period child supported by state where
    Acknowledgment of Paternity is reviewed and court [jury]finds petitioner is not father
    of the child.

    TRIAL
    a) You (State of Connecticut Child Support Enforcement) will take/assume the initiative of requesting trial for a jury to determine [ascertain] paternity as required by law [citing defendant’s right to trial for which it was illegally denied and infringed upon].

    YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THERE ARE NO OTHER ALTERNATIVES TO THE ABOVE OPTIONS TO SETTLE THIS MATTER.

    THE FACTS STATED ARE AS FOLLOWS:
    • The only existing element linking me to the alleged paternity is a coerced signature by the State of Connecticut Child Support Enforcement. This allegation was already made against the State (Jonathan Harding representing State) without denial or contesting such allegation – this is considered a confession. Coercion is illegal in Connecticut as the threat of incarceration provided the reason for my signature and is hereby (and still is) considered invalid and illegal.
    • The State of Connecticut neglected to check/validate all documents pertaining to the Acknowledgement of Paternity resulting in multiple state, civil and rights violations. The lower court then followed suit and failed to validate the documents submitted by the State also resulting in multiple state, civil and rights violations.
    • The Plaintiff and the State were allowed eighteen (18) years to petition paternity (according the Connecticut state law) and opted not to exercise this option. DNA, being the most valuable piece of paternity evidence that could ever be introduced in court, was not an option for the State to hold against me for liable paternity.
    • The State and the lower courts have failed to produce any recorded transcript of the original hearing commencing in 1989 because they didn’t record hearings at that time period and therefore have nothing to reference any liability on behalf.
    • The lower courts indicated in a recent hearing that an alleged second male child was also held against me for child support. I was never served to appear in court. There was no judge I faced for this allegation. There was no court appointed attorney to reference. There was no change in arrears or support.

    The above statement is also supported by a missing file in the docket reported by me. This file (document) had the alleged second child’s name CROSSED OFF with a reference at the bottom of the document indicating that the defendant could not be found to be served. I inquired with the Attorney General’s office to launch an investigation into the matter, but it was quickly dismissed to support the conspiracy to conceal fraud committed by the State and/or the lower courts.

    • There are no waivers signed or acknowledged by me as required by state law (Sec. 47b-172 including subsections).
    • There is no waiver of right to trial.

    TRUTH IS A DEFENSE – LAW IS A DEFENSE – FACTS ARE A DEFENSE

    Final Statement

    There is a reason why my civil and federal right to trial has been denied and infringed upon – it is because the State as well as the courts do not want conspiracy to conceal fraud surfaced in open court. The allegations against the State as well as the courts are so severe; they will open up ridicule and incrimination for the multiple violations (civil and federal) committed by the State and the lower courts.

    It would be suggestive to settle this matter and not opt for a trial – A trial opens up many doors for which you want to stay closed forever. A trial, upon my victory, will also “open up a can of worms” resulting in a public announcement of such victory – law firms and attorneys will undoubtedly salivate at the opportunity to open up old paternity cases referencing the victory of my trial for which, I could be mistaken, you would want to avoid at all costs and avoid the media.

    So hang onto that signature that you hold in the highest order to claim paternity against me, because it was coerced – it’s illegal and NEVER has been proof of paternity in this state. You have no waivers, no DNA, no transcript of ANY hearing that commenced on the original court date and you (and the courts) violated laws and civil/federal rights [trial] willfully in your feeble attempt to conceal fraud. The courts do NOT govern laws mandated by legislature, but they are REQUIRED to cite them in their findings/rulings – it’s shameful to our judiciary system that magistrates compromise law for their own personal gratifications and agenda.

    But then again, maybe you want a jury to hear all of this – your decision will predicate your intelligence…or lack of it.

Leave a Reply