Zašto nam priopćenja za štampu i usluge distribucije nisu uspjele ...

svjedodžba

Nakon plaćanja za nekoliko priopćenja za medije i usluga distribucije,
otkrili smo da su Komunalne vijesti bolja BESPLATNA usluga


Kad sam plaćao uslugu za tisak, niti jednom novinska agencija nije pokupila naše članke. Još gore, kad sam pretraživao Google koristeći točan naslov koji sam koristio u svojoj vijesti, nisam ga mogao pronaći. Čini se da je moje izdanje nestalo. Sada znam zašto to nije uspjelo. Dopustite mi da objasnim.

Google penalizira post ako pronađe više primjeraka. Priopćenje je prva kopija. Tri novinske agencije ga u najboljem slučaju podižu (čineći četiri primjerka). Svaka kopija podijelila bi otprilike jednu četvrtinu vrijednosti pretraživanja, što bi mjesto pretraživanja svake kopije postavilo mnogo niže u indeksu od jednog dobrog posta.

Web stranice za distribuciju priopćenja ne mogu ograničiti broj objavljenih izdanja. Njihove web stranice sa informativnim feedovima dobivaju vrlo niske Googleove ocjene zbog prekomjernih kopija. Te vrlo loše ocjene web stranica onemogućile su mi da na svjetskom webu pronađem dokaze da sam odobrio izdanje vijesti

Slijedom toga, naša vrlo važna vijest nikada nije viđena, iako sam platio uslugu priopćenja. Ne želim podrazumijevati da su sve tiskovne agencije loše. Ali, u današnjoj matrici pretraživanja kojom dominira Google, maloprodajne usluge za priopćenja za medije u osnovi su zastarjele. Čitava struktura priopćenja za medije sada je kažnjena Googleovim trenutnim algoritmima, zbog čega izgleda da članci vijesti o klijentima poput mojih nestaju. Veće, što se naziva "izdavanjem tvrtki", ima najgore Googleove ljestvice. Stoga se čini da Google algoritmi uistinu čine strukturu priopćenja za tisak oksimoroničnom uslugom.

Kad sam pogledao više kopiranih postova na nekoliko web stranica i pogledao druge besplatne web stranice, našao sam isti učinak kao i priopćenja za tisak: nepregledani ili nestali članci. Ni na koji način nisu nadgledali broj primjeraka. Dakle, moji su najvažniji članci ušli u ono što ja nazivam "internetskim bojilima." Drugi ga nazivaju ghosted. Ako nisam mogao pronaći svoje članke koji znaju točno prave riječi koje bih mogao upotrijebiti, kako bi se bilo koji od mojih budućih klijenata mogao nataknuti na moj rad. Odgovor je bio jasan; nikad nisu mogli.

Napisali smo postove "samo financijski" na Seeking Alpha i postigli jedno od najvećih praćenja obveznica koje su često bile na prvom mjestu u pregledima. Iznenađujuće za mene, nisam pisao za njih više od godinu dana, a ipak me danas svrstavaju na 1. mjesto u trenutnim pogledima. Ponekad je Seeking Alpha izrezao sve moje veze i gotovo uvijek izrezao jednu ili dvije od dopuštene tri veze. I apsolutno su ograničili broj primjeraka.

Since my service with them became very popular, they started charging a significant monthly fee for their clients to read our authored articles. The real problem for my team was that the Seeking Alpha model of charging a monthly fee to see our work became a direct competitor. They were working in opposition to the services my team was providing while knowing we too were trying to provide a fee-based service. I believe that is why they seemed to always cut our links. So again, just like the press release distribution services, both of these business structures often work against my company’s best interest, making it very hard for us to utilize the internet to grow.

Now with Communal News, I see my articles right away. I am able to bring them up speedily on Google search by simply using the title of my article. Communal News provides my whole written article without limiting my words (with all three links) The price makes me very happy as FREE is a very good price.

But now, the drawbacks. I posted a couple of articles on other free websites along with Communal News. Then received an email from the editor of Communal News saying they took down my article for breaking the “only one other post” policy. That is when I realized why Communal News has worked for me. It is considerably better to work with a website that monitors and keeps a good search ranking for their clients.

Another current drawback is the Communal News site is still young and does not have the readership achieved at Seeking Alpha. But, Communal news is putting up very strong growth rates, considerably faster than Searching Alpha did. Even with less readership and not being in competition, it appears to be a wash in leads coming in for us.

So now, I’m relieved again when an editor limits the number of copies, and does not cut my links. The more I think about it, it’s nice to see someone increasing the overall quality, working with Google and me, instead of against the search engine and my business, as I realize this model is best for improved article placements. Plus I like getting an immediate recognition when I see my article is on their site. I can often find the post in Google search, often at the very top of the title search the next day.

In conclusion, I am greatly relieved when an editor limits the number of copies and does not cut my links. The more I think about it, it’s wonderful to see someone (Communal News?) increase the overall quality working with Google and me, instead of against the search engine and my business. I realize their model is best for improved article placement. It’s gratifying to get immediate recognition when I see my article on their site. I can easily find the post in Google search, often at the very top of the title search the next day.

I wonder how they could do it for free. Communal News is a far better service that works in stride with us to attain a large audience for everyone.”

Randy Durig
Founder of FXXNUMX Portfolio